Give campaigns distinct jobs
Campaigns expanded from 39 to 145 with separate targeting roles, so budget could be allocated deliberately rather than averaged across the account.
Case Study · OTC pharmaceuticals
An established OTC manufacturer had recorded fifteen consecutive months of declining sales. Amplify rebuilt the advertising structure and catalog content, measuring the turnaround against the account's sales history.
Started November 2025 · Nine-month engagement snapshot
Revenue per day versus baseline
Daily revenue index · baseline = 100
The Starting Point
The brand operated 38 active SKUs on Amazon US, serving consumers and Amazon Business buyers through Seller Central. At handover, annual Amazon sales were approximately $12M, but advertising was limited to 39 campaigns and $2,982 in monthly spend. Shoppers often searched by active ingredient rather than brand.
The Work
Campaigns expanded from 39 to 145 with separate targeting roles, so budget could be allocated deliberately rather than averaged across the account.
The team produced 123 catalog and creative assets: 41 copy rewrites, 43 product-page images and 39 A+ modules. Production was tracked through to publication.
Seller Central sales history supplied a 453-day baseline. Reporting compared revenue and units per day; pre-engagement session data was not available.
The Results
Started November 2025 · Nine-month engagement snapshot
Versus the 453-day sales-history baseline.
Versus the same 453-day baseline.
Reported in the nine-month engagement snapshot.
| Measure | Starting point / baseline | Reported outcome | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue per day | 453-day baseline | +25.2% | Normalized daily comparison |
| Units per day | 453-day baseline | +31.3% | Normalized daily comparison |
| Active campaigns | 39 | 145 | Distinct targeting roles |
| Advertising spend | Starting spend level | 28.8× | Reported scaling multiple |
| Blended advertising cost of sales (ACoS) | — | 14.8% | Advertising efficiency; not a profit margin |
| Blended total advertising cost of sales (TACoS) | — | 6.6% | Advertising spend relative to total sales |
| Ad-attributed revenue | — | $2.84M | Advertising reporting; not incremental total revenue |
| New-to-brand sales | — | $841K | Reported engagement snapshot |
| Buy Box ownership | — | 96.5%–98.4% | Reported range |
| SKUs rated Healthy on inventory | 38 active SKUs | 35 | Snapshot inventory status |
The Takeaway
Campaign roles, current product content and a reconciled baseline made the account easier to steer. The result is measured in revenue per day and units per day, alongside Advertising Efficiency, rather than spend alone.
The source describes a nine-month engagement beginning in November 2025 but does not specify the exact reporting end date. Daily revenue and unit changes are measured against a 453-day pre-engagement baseline. No pre-engagement session data was available, so no before-and-after conversion uplift is claimed. ROAS, ACoS, TACoS and new-to-brand sales are reported snapshot metrics; ad-attributed sales are not the same as incremental sales.
Source: Amplify eComm engagement reporting, summarized September 2026. Client identity withheld.
Talk through the priorities with a founder.